Formerly known as Azure AI Services or Azure Cognitive Services is a unified collection of prebuilt AI capabilities within the Microsoft Foundry platform
Hello @David Meyer ,
Welcome to Microsoft Q&A .Thank you for reaching out to us.
Thank you for the detailed inquiry. This scenario involves a shared-responsibility model between Microsoft and Anthropic.
As Claude models in Foundry operate under a multi-party processing model. Prompts and outputs are handled by Anthropic, while Microsoft provides the platform layer.
When Claude models are used via Foundry:
- Prompts and generated outputs are processed by Anthropic, which operates the models on its own infrastructure
- Microsoft provides the platform layer, including identity, billing, and API management, under the Microsoft Products and Services Data Protection Addendum (DPA)
As a result:
- Prompt and completion data is processed outside Microsoft-managed model infrastructure
- Microsoft primarily handles platform-level data such as authentication, usage, and billing information
Documentation indicates that prompts and outputs are processed by Anthropic. However, detailed statements describing retention behavior for this integration are not explicitly defined.
Based on available terms:
- Prompts, outputs, and related metadata may be processed and potentially retained for operational purposes such as:
- Safety and abuse monitoring
- Service reliability
- Diagnostics
- In the absence of explicit retention guarantees, it should not be assumed that no retention occurs.
Public documentation provides general guidance on processing purposes but does not specify:
- Exact retention duration
- Detailed scope of stored data or logs
- Full data lifecycle for prompts and outputs in this integration
Retention behavior is therefore described at a high level, with specific timelines and implementation details not publicly detailed.
Retention and processing are governed by a combination of:
- Anthropic Data Processing Addendum and service terms, which define how prompts and outputs are handled
- Microsoft Products and Services DPA, which applies to Microsoft’s platform-level data processing
- Commercial agreements between Microsoft and Anthropic, which may include additional provisions that are not publicly available
This results in a shared contractual model rather than a single governing document.
Microsoft documentation, including the Claude models data privacy guidance in Foundry, outlines:
- Roles and responsibilities of Microsoft and Anthropic
- The separation between platform services and model processing
However, it does not provide detailed definitions of:
- Retention duration
- Logging or telemetry scope
- Complete data lifecycle for prompts and outputs
As of now, there is no single document that fully describes all aspects of retention behavior for this integration.
As Claude models in Foundry are third-party models operated by Anthropic and are not Azure direct models,
As a result:
- Data processing occurs on external infrastructure managed by the model provider
- Data handling characteristics may differ from Azure-native models where retention behavior is explicitly defined
Public documentation describes roles and responsibilities but does not define detailed retention behavior such as duration or scope. Retention is governed by provider terms and applicable agreements, with some aspects not fully detailed in public materials.
The following references might be helpful , please check them out
Thank you